Let's add a reading time estimate to articles posted on the readings page: th...

Let me check the word counts of those three readings and the display component.

Now let me see how the resources page displays readings.

Now I have everything I need. Here's my plan:

• Word counts: McLuhan ~8,328 words, "Blurry JPEG" ~3,563 words, "Case that AI is Thinking" ~5,739 words
• At a slow reading pace (~200 wpm, high end), that's roughly: McLuhan ~42 min, Blurry JPEG ~18 min, AI Thinking ~29 min
• I'll round up generously for "high end": McLuhan ~45 min, Blurry JPEG ~20 min, AI Thinking ~30 min

I'll add a readingTime field to ReadingMeta, set it in the frontmatter of those three files, and display it on both the reading page and resources page.

Now I'll make all the changes. Using ~200 wpm (slow reader pace) and rounding up: McLuhan 8328 words → 45 min, Blurry JPEG 3563 → 20 min, AI Thinking 5739 → 30 min.

Now add the reading time display to both the resources page and the individual reading page.

Let me verify the build passes.

All clean. Here's what I did:

Added readingTime field to ReadingMeta in packages/types/src/content.ts.

Set reading times (using ~200 wpm, a slow/careful reader pace, rounded up):

• McLuhan "The Medium is the Message" — 45 min (~8,300 words)
• "ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web" — 20 min (~3,600 words)
• "The Case That A.I. Is Thinking" — 30 min (~5,700 words)

Display:

• Resources page: Shows "· 45 min read" after the author name in each reading card
• Individual reading page: Shows "45 min read" in the italic line at top-right, before the fair use notice

Let me check the readings loader to see if it's passing through readingTime.

Found it — readingTime isn't being extracted from frontmatter. Now let me find tomorrow's meeting page.

Tomorrow is March 5. Let me check that meeting page.

Now I have everything. I'll add the combined reading time (20 + 30 = 50 min) to the "Before Class" section.

Let me verify the build still passes.

All good. Two fixes:

1. Resources page — the readingTime field wasn't being extracted from frontmatter in apps/web/lib/readings.ts. Added it to the returned object.

2. Meeting page — added "~50 minutes of reading" (20 + 30) to the "Before Class" section of the March 5 meeting.

The changes are clean — no debug statements. I'll split into two commits: one for the dependency bumps (@types/node, swr) and one for the reading time feature.

Two commits:

1. Bump @types/node to 25.3.3 and swr to 2.4.1 — the pre-existing dependency updates across all packages
2. Add reading time estimates to readings and meeting page — the feature work

All three lint errors fixed:

• Removed unused totalPausedMs destructure
• Changed let to const for futureTimeline
• Removed unused children parameter from LinkSubmission

Clean — no debug statements. All changes are lint/formatting fixes, the reading time display tweaks, a turbo version bump, and a trailing newline fix in the DB journal. I'll do two commits: one for the lint fixes + formatting, one for the dependency bump.

Done — two commits:

1. Fix lint errors and auto-format source files — removed unused vars, let→const, reformatted long lines across components and tests
2. Bump turbo to 2.8.13 and update package versions — the remaining package.json/lockfile changes

Let me explore how the current activity stages and group activities are structured to understand what a change like this would involve.

This is an interesting pedagogical design question. Let me think through the tradeoffs.

Current structure (per round in March 5):

• 15m discussion + text submission together (GroupActivity with TextSubmission inside)
• 10m share out (TextSubmissionBoard)

Your proposed structure:

• N min discussion only (talk, no typing)
• P min report out (individual typing)
• R min share out

What I think works well about the split:

• Clearer signal about what to do at each moment — "now talk, now write, now listen"
• Prevents the early-finisher idle problem because everyone types at the same time
• May actually improve discussion quality since students focus on talking rather than trying to simultaneously type notes

Potential concerns:

• More stages for the instructor to manage (3 per round instead of 2, so 9 total instead of 6 for a three-round discussion)
• Students still might finish typing at different speeds during report-out, creating a smaller version of the same idle problem
• Some students naturally jot notes while talking — removing that could mean they forget points

Technically this is straightforward — just restructuring the MDX to move TextSubmission out of the GroupActivity into its own stage.

Good, clear direction. Let me write the plan.