When I run bun test it should skip the e2e tests which don't work with Bun's ...

Let me explore the project structure to understand how tests are currently configured.

I see the e2e tests are Playwright tests in testing/e2e/. I'll create a bunfig.toml to configure Bun's test runner to skip that directory, and add a test script to the root package.json.

Let me verify the configuration works.

The exclude pattern isn't working as expected. Let me check for any actual unit tests and adjust the configuration.

Let me fix the pattern - it likely needs to be a relative path without the leading **/.

The search reveals that Bun's test runner does not support exclude patterns - it's still an open feature request. The exclude option in bunfig.toml doesn't work for test file filtering.

The workaround is to specify which files/directories to test via CLI arguments. Since your unit tests use .test.ts and e2e tests use .spec.ts, I can target only .test.ts files.

Need to use ./ prefix for paths.

Now it works. Let me verify the script works too.

The bunfig.toml isn't needed since we're using CLI arguments. Let me remove it.

Done. bun test now runs only unit tests from apps/, packages/, and tools/ directories, skipping the Playwright e2e tests. The solution uses directory arguments since Bun doesn't support exclude patterns yet (open feature request).

Yes, that's correct. From my earlier search, the only unit test file is:

• packages/canvas/tests/client.test.ts

That's the one file that ran with 18 tests. The e2e tests in testing/e2e/ use Playwright and are run separately with bun run test:e2e.

I'll add testIgnore to exclude mobile-screenshots from the default run. Users can still run it explicitly with --project=mobile-screenshots.

Actually, testIgnore will prevent --project=mobile-screenshots from working. A better approach is to update the default test command to exclude it.

There's a disabledByDefault property being added via PR #35337. Let me check if it's available in your Playwright version.

The feature was approved. Let me check if it's available in your Playwright version (1.57.0).

Unfortunately, disabledByDefault isn't available yet—the PR was closed without merging. The cleanest workaround is to conditionally include the project via environment variable:

Done. Now:

• bun run test:e2e skips mobile-screenshots by default
• bun run test:mobile (in testing/e2e) runs it explicitly

1. package.json - Added test script to run bun tests, excluding e2e tests by specifying directories
2. testing/e2e/package.json - Updated test:mobile script to set MOBILE_SCREENSHOTS env var
3. testing/e2e/playwright.config.ts - Refactored to conditionally include mobile-screenshots project

These are all related changes that should go in one commit. Let me commit them together. </thinking>

The changes look clean with no debug statements. Summary:

1. package.json: Added test script that runs Bun tests from apps/, packages/, tools/ (skipping Playwright e2e tests)
2. testing/e2e/package.json: Updated test:mobile to set MOBILE_SCREENSHOTS=1 env var
3. testing/e2e/playwright.config.ts: Refactored to conditionally include mobile-screenshots project (disabled by default)

These are related changes for configuring test runners. I'll commit them together.

Committed as d9dc570. Working tree is clean. Push when ready with git push.

This is a fun brainstorming task! Let me look at your course content to understand the context better before drafting ideas.

This is a rich context! I can see:

• First meeting: Thursday, January 22 (today!) - 75 minutes, 2-3:15pm
• Week 1 theme: "What is AI? What is intelligence?"
• Lab planned: "First Contact with AI" with an AI Scavenger Hunt

The Turing test fits perfectly with the Week 1 theme. Let me draft a plan with multiple activity options.

I've drafted a plan with 5 different AI-themed meet & greet options and a full class structure. Let me ask a few questions to help refine the recommendations.

That's a great structure - it combines movement/mingling with substantive AI discussion, and naturally surfaces the diversity of perspectives in the room. Let me update the plan with this as the primary activity.

Now let me update the schedule to reflect this flow better.

The plan now has your "AI Perspectives Speed Rounds" as the primary activity, which flows naturally into the Turing test discussion since students will have just been debating whether AI is impressive and how it's affecting them.

Great approach - fits the discussion-based, student-driven course philosophy. Let me revise the plan to expand the meet & greet and assign the Turing test as pre-work.

Got it - let me simplify the plan to just what you need for today's 75 minutes.

Let me fix a small inconsistency in the timing.

The plan is ready - focused just on today's 75-minute class with:

1. AI Perspectives Speed Rounds (30-35 min) - 8 questions, new partner each round
2. Share-out + Course Overview (20 min) - surface themes, brief logistics
3. Turing Test Teaser (10 min) - assign AI-assisted learning before next class
4. Wrap-up (5 min)

That's a smart idea - single source of truth with role-based visibility. You could have MDX components like:

<InstructorOnly>
### Facilitation Notes
- Watch for students who seem isolated during speed rounds
- If energy drops, skip to question 8
</InstructorOnly>

<StudentOnly>
### Today's Activity
Find a partner for each question and discuss for 3-4 minutes.
</StudentOnly>

## Questions
1. **How is AI affecting you personally?**

The shared content (questions, schedule) appears for everyone, while instructor notes and student instructions are role-specific.

Good question about server-side filtering. Let me explore how your MDX rendering currently works to see what's feasible.

This is good news for server-side filtering. Since pages use Server Components that dynamically import MDX, you can create <InstructorOnly> and <StudentOnly> components that:

1. Check auth status on the server
2. Return null for unauthorized users - content never reaches the client
3. Work seamlessly in MDX files

Let me update the plan with this implementation approach.

That's a more powerful pattern - role-aware components that render completely different UIs, not just show/hide. Let me update the plan to reflect this general capability.

The plan now covers two things:

1. Today's class (the first ~110 lines) - ready to use
2. Role-aware MDX components - the infrastructure for future meetings

Let me update the plan with these specifics and then exit plan mode so we can implement.

The plan is ready with:

• Today's class structure (AI Perspectives Speed Rounds → Share-out → Turing Test teaser)
• Role-aware MDX component architecture
• Implementation tasks and verification steps

Let me also check how auth and roles currently work in the codebase to ensure the plan is accurate.

Now I have all the context. Let me update the plan with accurate implementation details matching the existing patterns.

The plan is now complete with:

1. Today's class - AI Perspectives Speed Rounds activity
2. Infrastructure - Role detection utility and MDX components
3. Test semester - Stable test fixtures that won't change with course content
4. Meetings route - Page to render meeting MDX files
5. E2E tests - Using existing testUsers fixture for different roles
6. Verification - Clear steps to confirm everything works

That makes sense - test the components in isolation first rather than through a full meeting page. We can create simple test routes or MDX files that exercise each component individually.

Updated the plan to use focused test routes:

• /testing/components/instructor-only - tests just InstructorOnly
• /testing/components/student-only - tests just StudentOnly
• Test routes return 404 in production
• E2E tests target each component individually