## Your task
Your task
Pull new page captures from the production database and clean them up for use as course readings. Follow this process strictly.
Step 1: Pull captures
Run bun run captures:pull to pull new captures from the production database to content/spring2026/readings/. Note which files are new.
Step 2: Clean remote DB junk
Run the standard cleanup query to remove iframe cruft captures (Disqus, reCAPTCHA, privacy popups):
bun run db:query prod "DELETE FROM page_captures WHERE url LIKE '%disqus%' OR url LIKE '%recaptcha%' OR url LIKE '%privacy-mgmt%';"
Step 3: Clean article cruft
For each new article, remove common capture artifacts:
- Advertisements:
Advertisementlines and[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](...)links - Image credits:
Credit...lines (NYT image attribution) - Bylines/bios: Author name, bio paragraphs that duplicate frontmatter info
- Datelines: Date stamps like "March 12, 2026, 8 AM ET" (the date is in frontmatter)
- Narration credits:
Read by.../Narration produced by.../Engineered by...blocks at article end - Newsletter boilerplate: "You're reading the X newsletter..." subscription cruft
- Internal publication links:
[Read: ...]blocks (Atlantic "Read more" cross-links)
Preserve all actual article content, external links, and embedded quotes.
Step 4: Restore section breaks
Open the original article URL and compare with the captured MDX. Where the original article has visual section transitions (extra spacing between sections, decorative dividers, typographic ornaments), add --- in the MDX on its own line with blank lines above and below.
Most publications (Atlantic, NYT, New Yorker) encode section breaks as CSS spacing only, which is lost during the HTML-to-Markdown conversion. These need to be restored manually by comparing with the original article.
Step 5: Preserve media embeds
If the article has an associated video or podcast (e.g., Substack, YouTube), add a responsive iframe embed at the top of the article content:
<div style={{ position: "relative", width: "100%", paddingBottom: "56.25%", marginBottom: "2rem" }}>
<iframe
src="EMBED_URL"
style={{ position: "absolute", top: 0, left: 0, width: "100%", height: "100%", border: "none" }}
allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture"
allowFullScreen
/>
</div>
Step 6: Add sidenotes
Review each article for opportunities to add 2-4 sidenotes connecting the article content to course themes. The sidenotes should help students relate what they're reading to their hands-on experience with AI in the course.
Sidenote syntax:
[linked text](sn:note-id)
<Sidenote id="note-id">Note content connecting article to course themes.</Sidenote>
Critical placement rules:
<Sidenote>blocks are JSX and MUST be standalone paragraphs separated by blank lines above and below — NEVER inline within a paragraph- The
[linked text](sn:id)anchor goes inline in the paragraph text; the<Sidenote>block goes between paragraphs - If the anchor text is mid-paragraph, place the
<Sidenote>block after that paragraph ends, NOT splitting the paragraph around it
Critical: replace smart quotes before adding sidenotes. Web captures contain curly/smart quotes (U+201C, U+201D, U+2018, U+2019) that break MDX JSX parsing. Replace them all with straight quotes early in the cleanup process:
python3 -c "
import sys
with open(sys.argv[1], 'r') as f: text = f.read()
text = text.replace('\u201c', '\"').replace('\u201d', '\"').replace('\u2018', \"'\").replace('\u2019', \"'\")
with open(sys.argv[1], 'w') as f: f.write(text)
" FILE.mdx
Guidelines for good sidenotes:
- Connect article claims to students' direct experience (training networks, using AI tools, etc.)
- Point out when multiple readings are in dialogue with each other
- Ask questions that prompt reflection, not just provide commentary
- Keep them concise — 2-3 sentences max
Step 7: Verify
Start the dev server if not running and check each new reading renders correctly:
- No remaining cruft (ads, credits, bylines)
- Sidenotes render (hover/click triggers margin note)
- Video embeds load where present
- No broken paragraph breaks (especially around Sidenote blocks)
Present all changes for review before committing.
Two new captures. Let me clean the remote DB junk and read both new files.
Now let me fix smart quotes in both files and fetch the original articles to check for section breaks.
Both sites are paywalled. I'll work from the article structure and standard publication patterns. Let me re-read both files after the quote fix and then clean them up.
You can't do it that way. You have to look at the original content. Many of these articles are paywalled, sadly.
You're right. Let me try archive.org or Google cache to access them.
I can't access the articles through any cache/archive service either. Could you open both articles in your browser and let me know where the section breaks are?
- NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/03/business/economists-once-dismissed-the-ai-job-threat-but-not-anymore.html
- Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/04/ai-industry-self-improving-bots/686686/
The NYT article already has ## headings in the capture (A Paradigm Shift, Everywhere but the Statistics, etc.), so that one may be fine. The Atlantic article has no headings, and its [Read: ...] cross-links often sit at section break positions, so I mainly need to confirm whether those are the break points or if there are additional ones.
In the meantime I can proceed with all the other cleanup steps (removing cruft, fixing formatting) and add the breaks once you confirm.
No, I'm not opening them manually. If you can't see them just don't add them. This is not a manual process.
Got it. Let me clean both articles and add sidenotes now.
Now the Atlantic article:
Now let me look at existing readings for sidenote style reference, then add sidenotes to both articles.
Good, I can see the sidenote style. Now let me add sidenotes to both articles.
Now let me add sidenotes to both articles. Starting with the NYT article:
I need to add the anchor first, then the sidenote block. Let me do them separately.
Now add a sidenote about the speed question:
Now the Atlantic article:
Now let me verify both files look correct, then start the dev server and check them.
I see a problem in the Atlantic article: the <Sidenote> for research-taste is not on its own paragraph line. It's inline with the continuation text "Instead of humans coming up with ideas...". Let me fix that.
Now let me check the dev server status and start it if needed.
Good, dev server is running. Let me check both readings render correctly.
The pages require auth so WebFetch sees the login page. Let me verify the MDX compiles by running a build check.
TypeScript checks pass. Let me also do a quick sanity check that the MDX sidenote syntax is valid by verifying the pattern matches existing working readings.
Both files look clean. Here's a summary of what was done:
2 new readings pulled:
- "Economists Are Drawing Stronger Connections Between A.I. and Jobs" (NYT, Ben Casselman)
- "The AI Industry Wants to Automate Itself" (Atlantic, Matteo Wong & Lila Shroff)
Cleanup performed:
- Replaced smart quotes with straight quotes in both files
- NYT: Removed image credits (2x), audio player (
Listen · 11:13 min), dateline, author bio, advertisement/skip-ad link; fixed broken italic formatting (much faster_."_) - Atlantic: Removed 3
[Read: ...]internal cross-links
Sidenotes added:
- NYT (4):
closet-test(automation heuristic),shadow-ai(worker adoption vs. institutional adoption),reshaping-not-replacing(job augmentation vs. replacement),speed-breadth(pace of change in the course itself) - Atlantic (3):
claude-writing-code(what "written by AI" really means),research-taste(human judgment in ML work),optimize-for(objective functions require human choices)
Skipped: Section break restoration (original articles are paywalled and inaccessible via any cache). The NYT article already has ## section headings from the capture.
Is there any way that we can improve the MDX conversion to preseve section breaks better? Do you have the original HTML content stored that you can learn off of?
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
Two new untracked files, no modifications to existing files. No debugging statements or logging to worry about since these are MDX content files. Looks clean.
Committed as c911b51.
Can you collect all of the Lila Shroff AI article MDX files and create a ZIP with them and put it in /tmp/?
Done. 6 Lila Shroff articles zipped to /tmp/lila-shroff-readings.zip.
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
Let me check what the dependency updates are.
All dependency updates, no debugging or logging concerns. Updates:
next/@next/mdx/eslint-config-next: 16.2.1 → 16.2.2@types/node: 25.5.0 → 25.5.2@types/smtp-server: 3.5.12 → 3.5.13@playwright/test/playwright: 1.58.2 → 1.59.1
Committed as b07219d. Clean working tree now.
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
Simple turbo update: 2.9.3 → 2.9.4 (package.json, bun.lock, and schema URL in turbo.json). No debugging or logging concerns.
Committed as 4057c29.
Your task
Pull new page captures from the production database and clean them up for use as course readings. Follow this process strictly.
Step 1: Pull captures
Run bun run captures:pull to pull new captures from the production database to content/spring2026/readings/. Note which files are new.
Step 2: Clean remote DB junk
Run the standard cleanup query to remove iframe cruft captures (Disqus, reCAPTCHA, privacy popups):
bun run db:query prod "DELETE FROM page_captures WHERE url LIKE '%disqus%' OR url LIKE '%recaptcha%' OR url LIKE '%privacy-mgmt%';"
Step 3: Clean article cruft
For each new article, remove common capture artifacts:
- Advertisements:
Advertisementlines and[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](...)links - Image credits:
Credit...lines (NYT image attribution) - Bylines/bios: Author name, bio paragraphs that duplicate frontmatter info
- Datelines: Date stamps like "March 12, 2026, 8 AM ET" (the date is in frontmatter)
- Narration credits:
Read by.../Narration produced by.../Engineered by...blocks at article end - Newsletter boilerplate: "You're reading the X newsletter..." subscription cruft
- Internal publication links:
[Read: ...]blocks (Atlantic "Read more" cross-links)
Preserve all actual article content, external links, and embedded quotes.
Step 4: Restore section breaks
Open the original article URL and compare with the captured MDX. Where the original article has visual section transitions (extra spacing between sections, decorative dividers, typographic ornaments), add --- in the MDX on its own line with blank lines above and below.
Most publications (Atlantic, NYT, New Yorker) encode section breaks as CSS spacing only, which is lost during the HTML-to-Markdown conversion. These need to be restored manually by comparing with the original article.
Step 5: Preserve media embeds
If the article has an associated video or podcast (e.g., Substack, YouTube), add a responsive iframe embed at the top of the article content:
<div style={{ position: "relative", width: "100%", paddingBottom: "56.25%", marginBottom: "2rem" }}>
<iframe
src="EMBED_URL"
style={{ position: "absolute", top: 0, left: 0, width: "100%", height: "100%", border: "none" }}
allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture"
allowFullScreen
/>
</div>
Step 6: Add sidenotes
Review each article for opportunities to add 2-4 sidenotes connecting the article content to course themes. The sidenotes should help students relate what they're reading to their hands-on experience with AI in the course.
Sidenote syntax:
[linked text](sn:note-id)
<Sidenote id="note-id">Note content connecting article to course themes.</Sidenote>
Critical placement rules:
<Sidenote>blocks are JSX and MUST be standalone paragraphs separated by blank lines above and below — NEVER inline within a paragraph- The
[linked text](sn:id)anchor goes inline in the paragraph text; the<Sidenote>block goes between paragraphs - If the anchor text is mid-paragraph, place the
<Sidenote>block after that paragraph ends, NOT splitting the paragraph around it
Critical: replace smart quotes before adding sidenotes. Web captures contain curly/smart quotes (U+201C, U+201D, U+2018, U+2019) that break MDX JSX parsing. Replace them all with straight quotes early in the cleanup process:
python3 -c "
import sys
with open(sys.argv[1], 'r') as f: text = f.read()
text = text.replace('\u201c', '\"').replace('\u201d', '\"').replace('\u2018', \"'\").replace('\u2019', \"'\")
with open(sys.argv[1], 'w') as f: f.write(text)
" FILE.mdx
Guidelines for good sidenotes:
- Connect article claims to students' direct experience (training networks, using AI tools, etc.)
- Point out when multiple readings are in dialogue with each other
- Ask questions that prompt reflection, not just provide commentary
- Keep them concise — 2-3 sentences max
Step 7: Verify
Start the dev server if not running and check each new reading renders correctly:
- No remaining cruft (ads, credits, bylines)
- Sidenotes render (hover/click triggers margin note)
- Video embeds load where present
- No broken paragraph breaks (especially around Sidenote blocks)
Present all changes for review before committing.
Three new captures. Let me clean the DB junk and read all three files.
Three new articles. Let me fix smart quotes in all three, then clean them up.
Now clean all three articles. Starting with the Atlantic piece (internal cross-links only), then the two NYT pieces (credits, audio, datelines, bios, ads).
Also fix the broken italic on line 46: 2023_._ "It turns out should be 2023. "It turns out.
Now clean the NYT teen chatbot article.
Fix the broken section heading on line 185: ## It's Not 'Her_,'_ It's Cheese
Now clean the Medvi/Gallagher NYT article.
Now add sidenotes to all three articles. Starting with the Atlantic piece on young people and jobs.
Need to add the anchor first.
Now the teen chatbots article.
Now the Medvi article.
Now let me verify the dev server is running and check the pages render.
Pages are behind auth so WebFetch can't verify them. Let me do a quick build check to confirm the MDX compiles.
Let me also do a final review of all three files to make sure sidenote blocks are properly separated by blank lines.
I see two sidenotes that are not properly standalone. In the Atlantic article, line 26 has the <Sidenote> followed by text on the same conceptual paragraph. And in the teen chatbot article, line 222 has </Sidenote> followed by (A on the same line. Let me fix both.
Both have the sidenote running into the next paragraph. Let me fix them.
Now let me do a final check on all three files.
Here's a summary of the 3 new readings, ready for review:
1. "Young People Are Falling Behind, but Not Because of AI" (Atlantic, Rogé Karma)
- Removed: 2 internal
[Read:]/[From:]cross-links, fixed broken italic (2023_._) - Sidenotes (3):
statistical-mirage(correlation vs. causation),ai-hiring-accelerated(dialogue with Casselman and Shroff readings),uncertainty(honest answer about AI and careers)
2. "What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots" (NYT, Kashmir Hill)
- Removed: image caption+credit, audio player, dateline, author bio, print edition note, advertisement
- Fixed broken section heading (
## It's Not 'Her_,'_ It's Cheese) - Sidenotes (3):
ones-and-zeros(knowing how it works vs. experiencing it),optimization-target(engagement as loss function),chatbot-skills(can AI practice build real social skills)
3. "How A.I. Helped One Man (and His Brother) Build a $1.8 Billion Company" (NYT, Erin Griffith)
- Removed: image caption+credit, audio player, dateline, author bio, print edition note, advertisement
- Sidenotes (3):
ai-enabled(AI as tool vs. AI as product),hallucination-costs(real-world cost of hallucination),loneliness(human cost of efficiency, connecting to teen chatbot article)
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
Three new untracked MDX reading files, no modifications to existing files. These are the cleaned captures from the previous task. No debugging statements or logging to worry about.
Committed as 521ffaf.
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
Version bump across all 26 packages: 2026.4.8 → 2026.4.9. No debugging or logging concerns.
Committed as c4f247b.
OK! Now we need to design this week's meetings. Use the schedule and propose designs for each, which I'll approve.
Good. I have the week's meetings. Let me now look at the specific details I need for the designs.
Now let me look at existing exploratory meeting examples and the specific readings for Thursday's discussion.
Let me read the most recent discussion meeting and a couple of Thursday's readings to understand the themes.
Now let me check what interactive components exist for the training lifecycle topic.
I now have comprehensive context for both meetings. Let me write the plan.
Here's a summary of the proposed designs:
Tuesday Apr 7 — Exploratory: Training Lifecycle
- Inductive session (no readings). Students discover the pretrain → fine-tune → RLHF pipeline by observing model behavior at each stage, then practicing preference ranking themselves.
- 8 stages, ~80 min: Explore three model versions → Discuss what changed → Be the RLHF rater (rank output pairs) → Discuss "what is good AI?" → Generate questions → Investigate → Share out
- No new components needed. Curated examples and ranking pairs in markdown.
Thursday Apr 9 — Discussion: AI Companions, Agents, and Trust
- 4-round paired discussion following the AI and Work pattern (10m discuss + 10m share-out × 4).
- Proposes adding the new teen chatbot reading as a 4th assigned reading.
- Arc: Your AI Self → Real Enough to Matter (group-chat) → Acting on Your Behalf → Who's Responsible? (group-chat)
- Needs: preparation chat, 2 group chat definitions, meeting file.
Open question: Should I add the teen chatbot article ("What Teens Are Doing With Those Role-Playing Chatbots") as a 4th reading for Thursday? It's directly on-topic and we just captured it.
Plan approved. Let me read the files I need for implementation, then build everything.
Now let me implement everything. I'll create all files in parallel.
Now the Thursday meeting file.
Now register both meetings in the registry.
Now let me verify everything compiles.
All compiles clean. Let me verify the dev server is running and check the pages.
Both meeting pages return 200. Let me also verify the new files are all in order.
All done. Here's what was created:
Tuesday Apr 7 — "How AI Learns to Be Helpful" (Training Lifecycle)
content/spring2026/meetings/2026-04-07-training-lifecycle.ts— 8-stage exploratory session- Stage 1-2: Curated examples of base/instruction-tuned/RLHF'd model responses
- Stage 3-4: Students rank 6 output pairs as RLHF raters (designed to surface disagreements about helpfulness vs. safety, honesty vs. kindness, etc.)
- Stage 5-8: Question generation, investigation, share-out
Thursday Apr 9 — "AI Companions, Agents, and Trust" (Discussion)
content/spring2026/meetings/2026-04-09-ai-companions.ts— 4-round paired discussioncontent/preparations/ai-companions.md— Preparation chat covering all 4 readingscontent/group-chats/ai-companions-real-enough.md— Round 2 facilitatorcontent/group-chats/ai-companions-whos-responsible.md— Round 4 facilitator- 4 readings assigned (including the new teen chatbot article)
Registry: Both meetings registered in apps/web/lib/meeting-registry.ts.
All files compile cleanly and both pages return 200 on the dev server.
Create e2e tests for both meetings and make sure they pass.
Let me look at existing meeting E2E tests to understand the patterns.
Now let me check the playwright config for how meeting test projects are defined.
Good, meeting test projects don't use dependencies: deps. Now I have the full pattern. Let me create both test files and register them in the playwright config.
Now register both test projects in the playwright config.
Now let me run both test projects.
The issue is that stage 2 uses the same groupKey as stage 0, so students should auto-reconnect. I shouldn't re-pair them. Let me check the screenshot and fix.
The issue is that formPair isn't scoped to the stage. For stage 2, I need to use formPairInStage. Also the partner rotation with the same groupKey means different partners. Let me fix the test.
Now run the Tuesday test again.
The screenshot shows a "prior partner warning" for stage 4. The student just worked with this person in a previous stage and the system is asking to find a different partner. This happens because the test is trying to pair students who were already partners. Let me simplify the test: just pair s1+s2 and s3+s4 consistently for new groupKeys (they haven't been partners in that key before).
Tuesday tests pass. Now run the Thursday tests.
All 4 tests pass across both meetings. Here's what was created:
-
testing/e2e/tests/meeting-2026-04-07.spec.ts— 2 tests for the Training Lifecycle meeting:- Page renders with activity stages
- Full 8-stage flow: pairing, advancing through explore/rank/questions/investigate stages, partner rotation between groupKeys, text-submission and question-entry visibility, cleanup
-
testing/e2e/tests/meeting-2026-04-09.spec.ts— 2 tests for the AI Companions discussion:- Page renders with reading links and preparation chat
- Full 8-stage flow: 4 discussion rounds with rotating partners, group-chat presence in rounds 2 and 4, text-submission in rounds 1 and 3, cleanup
-
Both registered as projects in
playwright.config.ts
Your task
First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.
Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.
7 untracked files (new meeting content + tests) and 2 modified files (registry + playwright config). No debugging statements to worry about — all content files and test code.
I'll make two commits: one for the meeting content (meetings, preparation, group chats, registry) and one for the E2E tests.
Two commits:
eb2217c— Meeting content: 2 meetings, 1 preparation chat, 2 group chats, registry update53e1c18— E2E tests for both meetings + playwright config