Implement the following plan:

Plan: Split discussion rounds into discuss / report-out / share-out stages

Context

In the March 5 "Does AI Understand?" meeting, each discussion round currently combines talking and text submission in a single 15-minute stage. Some students finish the TextSubmission early and sit idle. Splitting each round into three explicit phases (discuss → report out → share out) gives clearer structure and reduces idle time.

Changes

File: content/spring2026/meetings/2026-03-05-does-ai-understand.mdx

Restructure each of the 3 discussion rounds from 2 stages to 3 stages:

Current pattern (per round):

1. ActivityStage (15m) — GroupActivity with TextSubmission inside
2. ActivityStage (10m) — Share Out with TextSubmissionBoard

New pattern (per round):

1. ActivityStage (12m) — GroupActivity discussion only (no TextSubmission), autoComplete={false}
2. ActivityStage (3m) — Individual report-out with TextSubmission (outside GroupActivity)
3. ActivityStage (10m) — Share Out with TextSubmissionBoard

This means 9 stages total instead of 6, plus wrap-up and feedback.

Specific changes:

• Remove <TextSubmission> from inside each <GroupActivity> block
• Add a new "Report Out" <ActivityStage> after each discussion stage with a standalone <TextSubmission> (same IDs: round-1-notes, round-2-notes, round-3-notes)
• Update facilitation notes and pacing table to reflect 12/3/10 timing
• Update pacing table cumulative times:

File: testing/e2e/tests/meeting-2026-03-05.spec.ts

Update E2E test to account for the new stage numbering (9 stages instead of 6 before wrap-up/feedback). The test currently references stages by index, so indices will shift. TextSubmission assertions move from inside GroupActivity stages to the new report-out stages.

No component changes needed

TextSubmission already works outside GroupActivity (confirmed in study-guide-lab meeting). The only changes are to MDX content and the E2E test.

Verification

1. bun run tsc — type check passes
2. bun run lint — no lint errors
3. CI=true bun run test:e2e -- --project=meeting-2026-03-05 — E2E test passes with new stage structure
4. Manual: check dev server at the meeting page to confirm stages render correctly

If you need specific details from before exiting plan mode (like exact code snippets, error messages, or content you generated), read the full transcript at: ~/.claude/projects/-Users-challen-www-usingandunderstanding-ai/0d44dd88-78b3-4366-b9a6-51979ed854c8.jsonl

If this plan can be broken down into multiple independent tasks, consider using the TeamCreate tool to create a team and parallelize the work.

Your task

First, run git status, git diff, and git log --oneline -10 to understand the current state.

Then add and commit all modified files with a descriptive message. Break the changes into multiple commits if appropriate. If there are untracked files, ask if they should be added or added to the appropriate .gitignore file. The user may also want to take over at this point, so provide an abort option as well. Always check changes for unnecessary debugging statements or logging that might have been accidentally included. Prompt the user if you find any, and offer to remove each one by one. Do not use interactive git staging (git add -p) as it does not work.

Read the output file to retrieve the result: [tmp-path]

Can you pull the captures from the production database? I notice that, in a few cases pages were being captured twice. There also seems to be some unnecessary content captured separately from the NYTimes and Substack pages I tried to capture.

Wait, sorry. I want to both clean this up but also improve the capture script.

I'm pretty sure the script does pull from prod. It takes an argument. But let's improve the Greasemonkey script.