I'll start by reading the existing files to understand the current implementation before making changes.

Now let me read the remaining bin/ scripts I need to see the exact contents of.

Now I have a clear picture of all the existing scripts. Let me also check if there's an existing scripts/lib/ directory.

Now update deploy.ts to use the shared K8s module.

Let me verify the updated deploy.ts looks correct.

Looks good. Now update package.json and delete old scripts.

Now add the new db:query and logs entries. I'll put them after the existing db entries and after restart entries respectively.

Now delete the old scripts.

Let me verify what's left in bin/.

Good — only prod-env and run-with-env remain, as planned.

Now update CLAUDE.md. Let me read the relevant sections.

Now let me verify the final state of the key files.

Let me also verify the scripts/deploy.sh that was mentioned in the git status was already handled (it was deleted earlier and replaced by deploy.ts).

Let me do a quick type-check to make sure the new scripts compile.

The ENOENT issue is a bun build quirk with the output directory. Let me use tsc instead for type-checking.

Those are all just missing Bun/Node type definitions — expected when running tsc directly outside the project's tsconfig. The scripts are Bun-specific and the existing deploy.ts would have the same errors. The code is structurally correct.

Let me do a quick sanity check that the existing deploy.ts had the same type-checking situation (i.e., these scripts aren't covered by the project's tsconfig):

The project tsc passes fine — the scripts directory isn't part of the workspace tsconfigs (they're standalone scripts run directly with bun run).

Here's a summary of everything that was done:

Summary

Created: scripts/lib/k8s.ts

Shared module exporting NAMESPACE, ROOT, parseEnv(), dbName(), getDbPassword(), withPortForward(), dbUrl(), and loadEnvFile().

Created new scripts (replacing 8 bin/ pairs + 1 shell script)

Updated: scripts/deploy.ts

Now imports parseEnv, getDbPassword, withPortForward, dbUrl, NAMESPACE, and ROOT from ./lib/k8s instead of defining them inline.

Updated: package.json

• Pointed existing scripts at new .ts files
• Added "db:query" and "logs" entries

Deleted: 10 files

bin/db-migrate-dev, bin/db-migrate-prod, bin/db-query-dev, bin/db-query-prod, bin/embed-dev, bin/embed-prod, bin/logs-dev, bin/logs-prod, bin/restart, scripts/db-forward.sh

Kept as-is

bin/prod-env and bin/run-with-env (one-liner shell wrappers that use source/env -i).

Updated: CLAUDE.md

Dev Database and Production Database sections now reference bun run db:query and bun run logs instead of the old ./bin/ paths.

Let me find the relevant component.

Let me check what ViewAsStudentWrapper renders when not logged in.

The issue is clear. When not logged in (or not an instructor), ViewAsStudentWrapper returns null, but the wrapping <div> with the border still renders — producing an empty bordered separator. The fix is to move the border styling inside ViewAsStudentWrapper so the div doesn't render at all when empty.

The border div that wrapped ViewAsStudentWrapper in prose-with-toc.tsx was always rendered even when the wrapper returned null. I moved the border styling into ViewAsStudentWrapper itself so it only renders when the user is an instructor — no more empty bordered div for unauthenticated users.

(no content)

Good point. Let me check what the full sidebar looks like to understand the context.

So the sidebar is: TableOfContents then sidebarContent. The border-t on the sidebarContent div serves as a separator from the TOC above it — that's useful. But the ViewAsStudentWrapper border-t is also a separator from the TOC, and when both are present, you'd get two borders stacked.

The real question is: when not logged in, the only sidebarContent is PrintLinks, and its wrapping div has a border-t separating it from the TOC. That seems fine. But is there a case where sidebarContent is falsy and the ViewAsStudentWrapper border is the last thing — a separator with nothing below?

Let me check if PrintLinks can return empty.

PrintLinks also returns null when not an instructor. So when not logged in, both ViewAsStudentWrapper and PrintLinks return null. But the sidebarContent prop is still the <PrintLinks> React element (truthy), so the wrapping <div className="border-border mt-4 border-t pt-4"> renders as an empty bordered div.

Same fix — move the border into PrintLinks itself, and conditionally render the wrapper in ProseWithToc only if sidebarContent is actually provided.

The problem is that sidebarContent is <PrintLinks .../> which is always truthy as a React element, even though PrintLinks renders null at runtime. The border div gets rendered regardless. The cleanest fix is to move the border styling into PrintLinks itself (same pattern as ViewAsStudentWrapper), and drop the wrapper div in ProseWithToc.

The same issue existed with PrintLinks — it also returns null for non-instructors, but the wrapping border div in ProseWithToc was always rendered. Moved the border styling into PrintLinks itself (matching the pattern we used for ViewAsStudentWrapper), so now both components own their own separator and nothing renders when they return null.

You're welcome!

(no content)

Let me find all the relevant files first.

Good — the Turing Test assessment is visibility: public so anyone can access it. Let me read the specific files I need to modify.

Now I need to find the route for assessments to know the correct link for the Turing Test.

The Turing Test assessment route is /assessments/turing-test. Now I have everything I need. Let me also check what the blog utility uses to derive the slug from the filename, so I know if renaming the title also requires renaming the file.

The slug is derived from the filename (line 36). I'll rename the file to match the new title and update the frontmatter. Now let me make all the changes.

1. Rename the blog post file and update its title:

2. Add a "Try it" link to the index page — I'll add it to the assessments feature card:

3. Add a link to the Turing Test assessment from the design document:

4. Add a link to the Turing Test assessment from the blog post:

Now let me check if there are any references to the old blog post slug or title elsewhere.

There's a reference in a meeting file. Let me update it.

Let me do one more check for any remaining references.

Clean. Here's a summary of all changes:

1. Renamed blog post: 2026-01-29-testing-the-testers.mdx → 2026-01-29-assessing-conversational-assessment.mdx, title changed to "Assessing Conversational Assessment"

2. Index page (page.tsx): The assessments feature card now has two links — "Try it" (→ /assessments/turing-test) and "How it works" (→ /design/assessments)

3. Design document (assessments.mdx): Added a "try it yourself" link to the Turing Test after the opening paragraph

4. Blog post (assessing-conversational-assessment.mdx): Linked "Conversational assessments" to the design doc at the top, and added a "try the Turing Test" link at the end

5. Meeting content (2026-02-03-assessments-and-agents.mdx): Updated the reference to the old blog slug

Done. The card is back to being a single link to /design/assessments with hover styling, and "Try it yourself!" is appended to the description text in accent color.

(no content)

Now apply the same pattern to the blog callout.

Done. All four cards now follow the same pattern: the monospace path and title are a link, and the description text below is static. The assessments card additionally has "Try it yourself!" linking to /assessments/turing-test inline in the description.

Let me check what link styling is used elsewhere on the site.

The standard pattern is text-foreground-muted hover:text-accent. The card links currently use just hover:text-accent without a base color, which means the heading text keeps its text-foreground color but the hover applies. Let me look at what the header link does since that's most similar — a non-muted link that highlights on hover.

The header link at line 64 uses hover:text-accent on text that inherits its color. The card title/path links are similar. The issue is the path span already has text-foreground-muted and the h3 has text-foreground — on hover, only the parent Link gets text-accent but the children have their own color classes that override it.

Let me fix this so the children inherit the hover color properly:

The children have explicit text-foreground and text-foreground-muted classes that will override the parent's hover:text-accent. I need to use group on the Link and group-hover:text-accent on the children so they respond to the parent hover.

Done. All four cards now use the group/group-hover:text-accent pattern — on hover, both the monospace path and the title transition to the accent color, matching the hover style used throughout the rest of the site.

I see a lot of package.json version bumps across workspaces (from the deploy script's version bumping) mixed in with the actual changes. Let me check what those package.json changes are.

The package.json changes are version bumps (2026.2.0 → 2026.2.1) from a deploy. The scripts/deploy.sh deletion was already staged from a previous commit (c618c57), and scripts/deploy.ts is showing as untracked because it replaced it.

I see three logical groups of changes. Let me also check for any debugging statements.

All legitimate user-facing output — no stray debugging. These are the same console.log messages from the original shell scripts (echo equivalents).

There are three distinct sets of changes here:

1. Migrate bin/ scripts to TypeScript — new scripts, deleted shell scripts, package.json script entries, CLAUDE.md docs, deploy.ts refactor
2. Version bump (2026.2.0 → 2026.2.1) across all workspace package.json files — from a deploy
3. Website content changes — sidebar border fix, blog post rename, assessment links on index/design/blog pages

I'll make three commits in order.

Clean working tree. Three commits:

1. 8e8e7ec — Bump version to 2026.2.1
2. 2586b50 — Migrate bin/ shell scripts to TypeScript
3. 339dd0c — Fix sidebar empty borders, rename blog post, add assessment links

(no content)

This is a completely different task. Let me explore the current layout structure to understand where a footer fits.

Let me explore the relevant files directly.

Let me also check the design pages to see what other links might make sense, and look at the turbo.json for env passthrough.

Now I have everything I need. Let me look at the homepage one more time to see the current link structure, then write the plan.