OK! We just created the new /create page. Next, I want to add this to the /ed...

You're right — the image is taking up the full column width and pushing all the text below it. In Typst, we can use wrap-top or wrap-bottom placement to flow text around a figure. Let me fix it:

The image is spanning the full page width which is great, but it's way too big. Let me shrink it and reduce the caption text size:

Still 3 pages. The scope: "parent" makes it span both columns which takes a lot of vertical space. Let me put it in a single column instead:

The issue is the image itself is very tall (it's a full screenshot of the digit network component). I should crop it or constrain the height. Let me try with a fixed height constraint and scope: "parent" with bottom placement:

That's much better! The figure sits at the bottom of page 2 spanning both columns. But we're at 3 pages — the Discussion, Acknowledgements, and References got pushed off. We need to trim content to fit everything in 2 pages. The Conversational Programming section's second paragraph (about transparency) could be shortened, and Discussion can be tightened. Let me also try reducing the image height a bit more:

Now tighten the Conversational Programming and Discussion sections:

Still 3. Let me also tighten the earlier sections:

That looks great! Single-column figure at the top of page 2, text flows in both columns below it, and everything fits on 2 pages with references and acknowledgements. Nice amount of white space too.

2 pages exactly. Ready to commit, or do you want to adjust anything?

Looking at the PDF, I can see:

1. Orphan on page 1: "ria tracking, and sends guidance to the interviewer about what to probe next." is an orphan line at the top of the right column (broken from the previous paragraph)
2. Several short lines that could be tightened by combining sentences
3. Some redundancy between the intro and the Conversational Programming section ("No human developers wrote, read, or debugged any of the source code" appears twice)

Now remove the duplicate "no human developers" line from the Conversational Programming section since it's already in the intro:

Also tighten the Interactive Pedagogical Tools to avoid a short final line:

Still 2 pages. Changes made:

• Removed orphan by merging "The system uses a two-agent architecture." into the next sentence with a colon
• Removed duplicate "no human developers" claim (kept in intro, rephrased in Conversational Programming)
• Tightened Agent-Guided Interaction: combined short sentences, cut redundant words ("key" takeaways → takeaways)
• Combined the two short sentences about objectives and completion into one
• Trimmed "class discussion" → "discussion" to avoid a short trailing line

Sorry, I'm making too many small edits one at a time. Let me just read the full file, make all the remaining fixes at once, and recompile:

Now let me make all the fixes at once:

Wait, I didn't add the AI agency mention. Where should it go? I think it fits naturally in the Discussion or Introduction. Let me add it to the Discussion where we talk about generalization:

Still 2 pages. AI agency is now mentioned in both places: the intro (as a course design principle) and the discussion (as a generalizable insight). Take a look and let me know which placement works better, or if both are good.

Now let me trim to get back to 2 pages. I'll tighten the Discussion section and the redundant AI agency mention there:

Still 3. Let me trim more aggressively. The Conversational Programming section can be shortened since the intro already mentions it:

Back to 2 pages.

Still 2 pages.

Good catches. Let me fix both:

Still 2 pages. Reference now shows "Geoffrey Challen and Claude" as authors, and the /create archive is described for educators rather than students.

Got it, sorry about that. I'll just compile from now on.

Still 2 pages. The flow now reads: verbal discussion first, then group chat with AI facilitator, with the option to return to verbal via pauses.

Still 2 pages at 90%.

Still 2 pages at full width.

Two untracked directories:

1. submissions/itel-flt-2026/ — the ITEL showcase submission (4 files: .typ source, .yml references, .png screenshot, .pdf output)
2. testing/e2e/submissions/ — looks like a stray empty directory

Should I add the submission.pdf to the repo, or add it to .gitignore since it's a build artifact? And testing/e2e/submissions/ looks accidental — should I ignore it?

Done. cc7c30f Add ITEL FLT Showcase submission. PDF is gitignored as a build artifact — rebuild with cd submissions/itel-flt-2026 && typst compile submission.typ.

Good idea. Let me add it:

Now add the citation in the text:

Still 2 pages.

Still 2 pages. Should be updated in Preview now.

3 pages — the smaller image pushed text differently. Let me also remove the PrairieTest reference since we dropped that content:

Back to 2 pages.

Glad it looks good! Want to make any more adjustments, or shall we commit?

No debugging statements. Content edits to the submission: "single educator," GPT reference, General Education wording, adversarial testing description, dropped PrairieTest reference.

Done. 328623a Revise ITEL submission.

You're right, it doesn't make sense as written. The fictional topic ensures the persona agents can't use their training data, not that the system detects memorization vs understanding. Let me fix it:

Still 2 pages.

That's what I did — the #link("url")[text] syntax in Typst shows only the text, not the URL. The links will appear as clickable gold underlined text in the PDF. Let me compile:

Still 2 pages. The tool names are now clickable links to their pedagogy pages.

You're right, we don't have one yet. Let me check the pattern and create it.

It's a dynamic route. Let me check where the content comes from:

I see the pattern. Tools are defined in the TOOLS array with slug, title, summary, pedagogicalGoals, howItWorks, and howCreated. I need to add the embedding explorer and import the component. Let me also fix the submission link and the educator writeup link at the same time:

Now add the embedding explorer to the TOOLS array after digit-network:

Now add the component case in the switch:

Now fix the submission link to point to the pedagogy page and the educator writeup link:

Now fix the educator writeup link to be text-based:

All done:

• Embedding explorer pedagogy page created at /spring2026/resources/embedding-explorer
• All three tool names in the submission are now clickable links to their pedagogy pages
• "Full educator writeup" is now a link instead of a bare URL
• "From memorization" dropped
• TypeScript compiles clean, PDF still 2 pages

No debugging statements. Two changes: embedding explorer pedagogy page and submission text fixes. Two commits:

Done. Two commits:

• 46829f5 Add embedding explorer pedagogy page
• 7c3f657 Polish ITEL submission: linked demos, cleaner writeup reference

Still 2 pages.

One small wording change. No debugging statements.

Done. 409ac77.

Here's my line-by-line review:

Issues found:

1. Line 75: "conducting assessments, facilitating discussions, and verifying reading preparation" — this describes what GPT does, but it appears before GPT is mentioned (line 80). It reads as if AI generally does these things, then two paragraphs later says GPT specifically does the same three things. Slightly redundant.

2. Line 79: "with no one writing, reading, or debugging source code directly" — "no one" is a bit awkward. Could be "without anyone writing, reading, or debugging source code directly."

3. Line 94: "whether students demonstrate understanding independently or only after prompting, a critical distinction" — missing a dash or colon before "a critical distinction." As written it's a comma splice. Should be "after prompting---a critical distinction" or "after prompting. This is a critical distinction."

4. Line 98: #cite(<challen2026assessing>) appears twice — once on line 89 and again on line 98. Both citations refer to the same blog post. The second citation (for the adversarial testing) is fine since it's the same source, but worth noting.

5. Line 103: "connects ideas across students" — works in context of more than 2 students, but earlier it says "verbal discussion in pairs." If it's always pairs, "connects ideas between partners" might be more precise. But pairs can still have ideas to connect, so this is minor.

6. Line 129: "all produced without writing, reading, or debugging source code directly" — this echoes line 79 almost verbatim. The Conversational Programming section repeats what the intro already said. Consider cutting this clause since the intro established it.

No typos or grammatical errors found. The writing is clean. The issues above are all stylistic. Want me to fix any of them?

Good numbers. Now let me update the text:

Let me fix lines 79 and 94 too:

Now let me check all the em dashes in the document to make sure none have spaces around them (Typst --- renders as an em dash):

All em dashes are without spaces — good. Let me compile:

Still 2 pages. Three fixes: "without anyone" (line 79), em dash before "a critical distinction" (line 94), and the Conversational Programming section now leads with the impressive stats (167 sessions, 3,000 turns, 50,000 LOC) instead of repeating the "no code" claim.

No debugging statements. Three small prose fixes.

Done. 73baa48.

Version bump across all packages.

Done. 080a429 Bump version to 2026.3.49.

Let me check if readings are actually in the documents table:

No pgvector container running. The local database isn't up. Let me start it and check:

67 documents are in the DB. Let me check if any are readings:

Readings ARE in the documents table. The source_url is the file path like content/spring2026/readings/.... Now let me check the search route to see why it returns 0 results:

The problem is on line 40: chunk.metadata doesn't have a sourceUrl field. The sourceUrl is on the document, not the chunk metadata. Let me check what the chunk metadata and document data look like:

Confirmed: sourceUrl is on the document, not in chunk metadata. The RetrievedChunk type already has documentId and documentTitle, but the route is looking for sourceUrl in chunk metadata where it doesn't exist. I need to use the document's source_url instead.

Let me check what RetrievedChunk returns:

RetrievedChunk has documentId, documentTitle, sourceType, and metadata but no sourceUrl. I need to either: (1) filter by checking if the document source_url contains "/readings/" using a SQL filter, or (2) look up the document source_url after retrieval.

The simplest fix: the documentTitle for readings contains the slug in the title (e.g., "Openai Is Opening The Door..."). But that's fragile. Better approach: filter documents by source_url pattern in the retrieval query. But retrieveChunks doesn't support source_url filtering.

Simplest reliable fix: query the documents table to get document IDs for readings, then pass those as documentIds to retrieveChunks:

Now let me restart the dev server and write a quick e2e test:

Now add an e2e test for the search returning actual results:

All 6 tests pass, including the new "searching returns relevant results" test. The fix was that the route was looking for sourceUrl in chunk metadata (where it doesn't exist) instead of querying the documents table directly for reading document IDs and passing them to retrieveChunks.

Unused Lock import in the readings search component:

All 39 tasks pass. Clean.

Now let me check the current playwright config to see which projects exist and if there's an onDemandProjects export:

Now let me check what the current test:e2e script looks like:

Good, the existing runner already has the structure. I need to add --interactive / -i support with @inquirer/prompts. Let me check if it's installed:

Now update the run-projects.ts to add --interactive / -i support:

Now add the interactive selection function and the --interactive flag handling:

Let me verify the --list flag works to make sure the project detection is correct:

Working correctly. Default projects (with dependencies) are listed first, on-demand projects (without dependencies) second.

Now let me commit everything — the search fix, the lint fix, the interactive runner, and the test:

Three logical changes. Let me commit them separately:

Done. Two commits:

• 93f24ac Fix readings search: query documents table for reading IDs
• a650c19 Add interactive project selection to e2e test runner

Run it with bun run test:e2e -i to try the interactive selector.

The Embedding Explorer section is missing the "Pedagogy & details" link that the other tools have. Let me check the pattern:

I see the pattern. The other tools have a header with the title and a "Pedagogy & details" link side by side. The Embedding Explorer just has a plain <h3>. Let me fix it:

Done. e587c55. The Embedding Explorer now has the same "Pedagogy & details →" link as the other tools, pointing to /spring2026/resources/embedding-explorer.