I need to configure the PrairieTest webhooks for this site. That requires bot...

That's the instructor completion summary from apps/web/app/assessments/[slug]/page.tsx. It shows for all instructors regardless of context. In CBTF it shouldn't be there — it's instructor-only admin info that doesn't belong on the student-facing testing interface.

I need to check if we're in CBTF mode in this server component and hide the banner. Let me also check if isCbtf is available here:

Wait — but the grant controls on the detail page also use isInstructor. In CBTF, instructors still need those. Let me separate the two concerns:

Now the completion summary is hidden in CBTF, but the grant controls (Start/Stop Session) still show for instructors. The headers() import was already there so no duplicate needed.

Clean. The completion banner is now hidden in CBTF mode while grant controls remain available for instructors.

The banner is outside the AssessmentDetailClient's max-w-4xl px-6 container. It's a sibling at the top level with no width constraint.

Now it matches the max-w-4xl px-6 mx-auto container used by the assessment detail client.

Three groups: runtime zod fix + CBTF UI fixes (server-api.ts, page.tsx, config.ts), and version bump (26 package.json files). No debugging statements.

Two commits:

• 87f868d — Runtime zod validation, trusted origins for dev/quiz domains, hide instructor notes in CBTF, fix banner width
• 7e6c1d1 — Version bump to 2026.4.5

Done. bun run dev:restart will stop the background server and start a fresh one.

Done. Stops the background server then runs foreground.

Committed 4613708.

All 26 package.json files are version bumps.

Committed 3cdd4a2 — version bump to 2026.4.6.

The attempt detail, evaluation, and assessment-chat endpoints all need the same grant check in CBTF mode. Let me see what needs protecting.

Let me check the remaining endpoints that need protection.

I have the full picture. Three endpoints need CBTF grant checks:

1. GET /:slug/attempts/:attemptId — view attempt (no grant check)
2. GET /:slug/attempts/:attemptId/evaluation — view evaluation (no grant check)
3. POST /api/assessment-chat — send messages (no grant check)

The cleanest approach is a shared helper that checks CBTF + grant for a given assessment slug and user. Let me write the plan.

1. Add shared helper

Wait — instructors should also be blocked when their session is inactive. The whole point is that without an active grant, nobody can access. Let me fix that:

2. Gate attempt detail endpoint

3. Gate evaluation endpoint

4. Gate assessment-chat endpoint

All 46 tests pass. Now for your frontend point — you're right. In CBTF mode, there should only ever be one attempt (the current one), and "Resume Assessment" handles it. Showing past attempts is unnecessary and the links are a security gap since the API now blocks them anyway. Let me hide them in CBTF.

The component needs to know if it's in CBTF mode. The server page already detects isCbtf — let me pass it down:

Now hide the past attempts section in CBTF mode:

Unrelated pre-existing type errors. Let me check our files specifically:

No type errors in our files. The errors are in unrelated test files. Let me run the CBTF tests:

All 46 passing. Summary of changes:

API — all assessment endpoints now check checkCbtfAccess() in CBTF mode:

• Attempt details (GET /:slug/attempts/:attemptId)
• Evaluation (GET /:slug/attempts/:attemptId/evaluation)
• Chat (POST /api/assessment-chat)

Frontend — past attempts list hidden in CBTF mode. "Resume Assessment" handles the active attempt.

The needsGrant check is instructor-only. In CBTF mode, the button should also be disabled for students when the grant is inactive. But students won't have hasGrant in the response — they just won't see the assessment at all if they don't have a grant. The issue is the instructor case: they see the assessment without a grant but shouldn't be able to resume.

The current needsGrant logic is correct for that — it disables the button when isInstructor && isTutoringCenter && !grantActive. But inProgressAttempt being truthy makes canStart true via the ||. Let me also handle the CBTF case where there's no grant regardless of role:

Now also update the message — it shouldn't mention "CBTF session above" for students who don't see the controls:

Done. The Begin/Resume Assessment button is now disabled for anyone (instructor or student) when the tutoring-center assessment has no active grant.

Button is now completely hidden when there's no active grant. Instructors see the "start a session" message, students see "waiting for activation."

The footer is pushing the page past the viewport. In CBTF mode it should be hidden — students don't need it.

The footer is in the root layout, so it appears on every page. The assessment chat page needs to hide it. Let me check how that page is structured:

The cleanest approach is to add a layout.tsx in the [attemptId] directory that hides the footer. But since the footer is in the root layout, the chat page needs to signal it. A simple approach: use CSS to hide the footer from this page.

Simplest approach: add a data-testid to the footer element and hide it from the assessment chat page using a layout with a CSS class on the container. Actually even simpler — add a layout.tsx in the [attemptId] folder that adds a class to hide the footer:

The footer is now hidden on the assessment chat page via a CSS import in a route-level layout. The site-footer class on the footer element gets display: none when that layout is active.

No cursor-pointer in the base button styles. Tailwind v4 removed the automatic cursor-pointer on buttons. Just need to add it to the base classes:

That fixes every Button across the site. All variants, all sizes.

The @/styles/globals.css import works in layout.tsx. The issue is that the [attemptId]/layout.tsx is a client-side layout and the CSS import might not resolve the same way. Let me just put the rule in globals.css scoped to the attempt page instead of a separate file:

Now add the CSS rule to globals.css:

I see the same pattern used for embed and display modes. Let me add the hide-footer rule using the wrapper class approach:

Wait — the layout wraps children in a div.hide-footer, but the footer is a sibling of <main> in the root layout, not a sibling of the div. The ~ combinator won't reach it. Let me reconsider.

The layout nesting is: <main> contains the page which contains the [attemptId]/layout.tsx div. The footer is a sibling of <main>. CSS can't select ancestors' siblings.

Better approach: use the same pattern as embed/display modes — set a class on <body>:

:has() is well-supported now. When the [attemptId] layout renders its .hide-footer div anywhere in the body, the footer hides. No JS needed.

One untracked file (the new layout) and 8 modified files. No debugging statements. I'll split into logical commits.

Two commits:

• 135ea32 — API: gate all CBTF endpoints on active grant
• bc611a0 — Frontend: hide button/attempts without grant, hide footer on chat page, fix cursor

Good findings. The infrastructure is already in place:

• The evaluator state updates after every message and is stored on the attempt record
• The attempt detail endpoint already returns evaluatorState for instructors
• Each message has an evaluatorSnapshot in its metadata

The main work is in the chat client UI. Let me write the plan.

Let me read the key files I need to modify, then implement.

Now let me check the admin review evaluator panel for patterns to reuse:

Good, I have the pattern. Now let me check the CRITERIA_COLORS constant:

Now let me check the evaluator service for the final evaluation function:

Now let me look at how the final evaluation is called in the chat route:

Good. Now I have everything I need. Let me implement all four pieces.

1. API: Provisional grade endpoint

Now add the provisional grade endpoint before the export:

2. Page — pass isInstructor

Now update the AttemptDetail interface to include evaluatorState, and pass isInstructor:

3. New component — EvaluatorSidebar

4. Chat client — integrate sidebar + fetch state after each message

Now add evaluatorState tracking and the fetch after each message. Add state:

Now I need to add the AttemptDetail evaluatorState field to the client:

Now add the fetch of evaluator state after each message completes. I'll add it right after the streaming finishes:

Now add the sidebar to the layout. The current layout is a single column. I'll wrap the main content and sidebar in a flex row:

All 46 passing. Here's what was implemented:

API (apps/api/src/routes/assessments.ts):

• POST /:slug/attempts/:attemptId/provisional-grade — instructor-only endpoint that runs the final evaluator on current state and returns a provisional grade without ending the assessment

Frontend:

• EvaluatorSidebar component — shows live criteria progress, evaluator guidance, notes, advance/complete flags, and a "Grade Now" button
• Chat client — fetches updated evaluator state after each message exchange; renders sidebar in a right panel (320px, hidden on narrow screens)
• Page — passes isInstructor to the chat client

The sidebar updates in real time as the conversation progresses, and "Grade Now" computes what the final grade would be at that point.

I need to test:

1. The provisional-grade API endpoint (instructor-only, returns a grade)
2. That the attempt detail includes evaluatorState for instructors
3. That non-instructors can't access the provisional-grade endpoint

Let me check what the cbtf-test-assessment looks like to understand what we can test without actually doing an LLM call (since the provisional grade endpoint calls chatJSON):

The provisional grade endpoint needs an actual LLM call, which the E2E tests mock via LLM_MOCK=true. Let me check if the mock handles chatJSON for assessment evaluation:

chatJSON uses chat which goes through the mock system. The mock falls through to real LLM for unrecognized prompts. The provisional grade endpoint will hit a real LLM call, which will fail in E2E without credentials.

So for E2E tests I should focus on:

1. API-level tests (status codes, auth checks) — these don't need the LLM
2. The evaluatorState being returned for instructors
3. The provisional-grade endpoint returning 403 for students and requiring instructor auth

The actual grading response test would need LLM credentials, so I'll skip that.

All 50 tests passing, including the 4 new ones:

• #45: Instructor attempt detail includes evaluatorState
• #46: Student attempt detail does NOT include evaluatorState
• #47: Provisional-grade endpoint requires instructor role (student gets 401+)
• #48: Provisional-grade endpoint accessible to instructors (auth passes, LLM runs)

No PID file — it was started with bun run dev (foreground mode) in another terminal. You'll need to Ctrl+C it there, or:

That's the API dev server (bun watch). Want me to kill it?

Done.

It thinks there's still one running. Let me check:

No processes on the ports, no PID file. The dev-server script's "already running" check must be detecting something else. Let me look at how it checks:

It's checking https://[local-hostname]/ which is still responding. Something else is serving that. Let me find it:

Something is still responding on that URL but no local process is on ports 3000/2001. Is there a local nginx or Caddy reverse proxy that's caching/serving a stale response?

Docker is listening on 443. There's a Docker container proxying HTTPS — likely Caddy or nginx. It's returning 200 even though the backend isn't running. The dev server script sees that 200 and thinks the server is already up.

There's an nginx container proxying 443. It's returning 200 (probably a cached or default page). You need to stop it, or the dev script needs

There they are — turbo dev and next dev still running as orphaned processes. The API process (29102) was killed but the parent turbo and web processes survived.

All dead. The issue was that I only killed the API child process (29102) earlier, but the parent turbo process (29056) and web process (29103) were still running. bun run dev should work now.

Children survived. Let me kill them all:

All clear now. The problem was orphaned child processes surviving after the parent was killed. bun run dev should start cleanly.

The client-side env.ts reads API_URL from window.__ENV which is injected by the root layout. The error says it's undefined on the client. Let me check the layout's script injection:

The layout injects the correct API_URL into window.__ENV. But the browser warning says "Scripts inside React components are never executed when rendering on the client." Next.js is not executing that <script> tag on client-side navigation.

This is a Next.js issue — the <script> in <head> via dangerouslySetInnerHTML doesn't re-execute on client nav. It works on full page load but not on soft navigation. The env.ts reads window.__ENV?.API_URL which is undefined if the script didn't run.

But this isn't a new issue — it would have always been broken on client navigation. The error is specifically happening on dev-quizzes where isQuizzes is true and the layout picks QUIZ_API_URL. Let me check if QUIZ_API_URL is set locally:

That's set. But this error is happening on the client side — the handleToggleGrant function in the assessment detail page calls env.NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL. The issue is that window.__ENV wasn't populated. This is likely because you navigated to the page via client-side navigation (clicking a link) rather than a full page load.

But actually, looking more carefully at the error — this is happening on a page served from [local-hostname]. The window.__ENV script should execute on initial page load. Is this a dev-quizzes page or a regular page?

Either way, the toggle grant function uses the client-side env which reads from window.__ENV. If the script tag didn't execute, API_URL is undefined. This is a known Next.js issue with dangerouslySetInnerHTML scripts in the layout.

The simplest fix: the handleToggleGrant already runs server-side via serverApiFetch for the page render, but the client-side button click needs the API URL. Since the toggle grant is an instructor-only client action, it should use window.__ENV?.API_URL or fall back. But really the root issue is that the script tag isn't executing.

Let me check if this only happens on the quizzes domain or everywhere:

Is this error happening on [local-hostname] or [local-hostname]?

The CSS body:has(.hide-footer) rule only applies when the [attemptId] layout's .hide-footer div is in the DOM. You're on the assessment detail page (/assessments/[slug]), not the chat page (/assessments/[slug]/[attemptId]). The footer should be hidden on the chat page after you start the assessment and navigate into it.

Or are you seeing the footer on the chat page itself after reload?

The layout renders <div className="hide-footer"> and the CSS rule is body:has(.hide-footer) .site-footer { display: none !important; }. Let me check if the footer actually has the site-footer class:

That looks right. Let me check the globals.css rule:

The CSS is correct. The issue might be that Tailwind is purging the site-footer class since it's not a Tailwind utility. Or body:has() isn't matching because the layout's <div className="hide-footer"> is nested inside the Next.js DOM differently than expected.

Let me check — the root layout has <main>{children}</main>. The [attemptId]/layout.tsx wraps children in <div className="hide-footer">. So the DOM should be body > ... > main > div.hide-footer > .... The :has() selector should find .hide-footer anywhere inside body.

The more likely issue: Tailwind CSS purges class names it doesn't recognize. hide-footer and site-footer are plain CSS classes in globals.css, not Tailwind utilities, so they should survive purging. But let me check if the CSS rule is actually being included in the output. The simpler fix is to use a data- attribute instead of a class:

Switched to data-hide-footer attribute (immune to CSS purging) and targeting footer element directly (no class dependency). This should work reliably.

One untracked file (new evaluator sidebar component) and 6 modified files. No debugging statements. All part of the same feature — instructor evaluator sidebar + provisional grading + footer fix.

Committed 31a925f — evaluator sidebar, provisional grading endpoint, footer fix, and 4 new E2E tests.

Missing deps in useCallback. Let me fix it:

All clean — 39/39 tasks passed, prettier formatted the files.

Done. bun run check passes clean.

Turbo already has a test task defined. Just need to switch the root script:

Now let me check which workspaces have test scripts so turbo has something to run:

Only 3 workspaces have test scripts. The old command (bun test ./apps ./packages ./tools) ran bun's built-in test runner across all directories. Let me check if there are actual test files:

Several workspaces with test files don't have "test" scripts. I need to add them so turbo can run them. Let me add "test": "bun test" to the workspaces that have test files:

Now for packages/agents — it doesn't have a scripts section, I need to find where to add it:

Now also fix the ldap test script which runs a lookup instead of bun test:

That's fine, the ldap test script is intentional (it's not a unit test). Let me verify everything works:

The e2e tests are being picked up by turbo — they have a "test" script that runs playwright, which fails because the dev server isn't running. The e2e tests shouldn't run with bun run test. Let me exclude them:

I can filter the e2e package out in turbo config:

Turbo doesn't support filter in task config. I'll use the CLI filter instead:

All 7 test tasks pass (e2e excluded), and 6/7 were cached. Running it again:

44ms, fully cached. All tests pass and caching works.

Clean changes, no debugging statements. All one logical change.

Committed 1ab5307.

Let me look more carefully at what's actually rendered at the top of discussion meetings — the user says they're already there.

These are internal <Link> components pointing to reading pages within the site. But the user wants them to open in new tabs on discussion meeting pages. Let me look at an actual discussion meeting to see how reading-link blocks are used:

The readings are markdown links in the meeting content, not reading-link blocks. They're rendered as regular <a> tags via the markdown renderer. Let me check what today's meeting looks like:

These are markdown links like [Title](/spring2026/readings/slug). They're internal links pointing to reading pages on the site. The markdown renderer handles them. Let me check how the meeting markdown component renders links:

Found it. Lines 92-99: internal links (like /spring2026/readings/...) use <Link> which does client-side navigation in the same tab. Reading links point to /spring2026/readings/slug — these are internal but should open in new tabs since students need to read them before class while keeping the meeting page open.

The simplest fix: detect reading links (href contains /readings/) and open them in a new tab:

Reading links in meeting pages now open in new tabs. Other internal links (like /syllabus, etc.) still navigate in the same tab.

Now add the prop:

Now

You're right. The content is just markdown strings in the .ts meeting files. You can use HTML directly in those strings:

- <a href="/spring2026/readings/coders-coded-their-job-away-..." target="_blank">Coders Coded Their Job Away</a> (26 min)

No component changes needed. Let me revert my MeetingMarkdown changes and just update the meeting file.

Good, meeting-markdown.tsx is back to its original state. But wait — react-markdown doesn't pass through raw HTML by default. Let me check if it does with the current config, or if I need rehypeRaw:

Raw HTML won't work in react-markdown without rehype-raw. But there's another approach — the a component override in MeetingMarkdown already handles rendering. Markdown links with target="_blank" won't work, but we can use the fact that react-markdown passes through attributes on standard markdown links if we use a different approach.

Actually, the simplest thing: just make these links external by using the full URL. The MeetingMarkdown component already opens external links (http...) in new tabs via ExternalLink. So change the meeting content to use absolute URLs for the readings:

Sorry. What's the right approach? I keep overcomplicating this.

react-markdown needs rehype-raw to pass through HTML tags. Let me check if it's already available.

Now update the meeting content to use <a> tags with target="_blank":

Added rehype-raw so react-markdown passes through HTML, then used plain <a target="_blank"> tags for the three reading links.

The reading links are being rendered as <Link> components (the $Ldb reference) without target="_blank". The rehype-raw isn't working because the a component override in MeetingMarkdown catches all <a> tags, including the raw HTML ones, and converts them to <Link>.

The issue is the component override. When rehype-raw processes the HTML <a target="_blank">, react-markdown still runs it through the a component override, which ignores target. I need to pass through the original props:

The a override destructures only href and children, dropping target. Just need to capture and pass it through:

Now the a override passes through target when present. The <a target="_blank"> in the meeting content will be honored.

No debugging statements. One logical change.

Committed a1c9c9c.

I need to convert the "Before Class" reading links (the ones at the top of discussion meetings) to <a target="_blank">. The inline references within discussion round content should stay as regular links. Let me update each file.

Now let me find the "Before Class" section in this file:

This one uses reading-link content blocks, not markdown links. The ReadingLink component renders them. I need to add target="_blank" support to the ReadingLink component:

I need to add a newTab field to the ReadingLinkBlock type:

Now update the ReadingLink component:

Good question. Some meetings use reading-link blocks (like does-ai-understand), others use inline markdown links (like ai-and-work and training-data-and-its-costs). There's no consistency. They should all use reading-link blocks since that's the dedicated component with reading time display. Let me check which meetings use which pattern:

Only 2 meetings use reading-link blocks. The others use inline markdown. Should I convert the inline markdown reading links in ai-and-work and training-data-and-its-costs (and any others) to reading-link blocks instead? That way newTab works everywhere through the component, and reading times are automatic.

Now the training data meeting:

Now check the medium-is-the-message and alphago meetings:

This one has inline markdown links to a reading. The "Please complete the reading" link should open in a new tab. But this is mixed into prose, not a bullet list. I'll convert it:

Now alphago — the reading links there are "reference during discussion" links, not "before class" links. Those should probably stay as inline links since students use them mid-discussion:

The transcript link here is a reference tool, not a "read before class" assignment. I'll leave this one as-is.

Now update the existing reading-link blocks in the two meetings that already use them — add newTab: true:

Now from-simple-parts:

Now update the meeting renderer to pass newTab through:

All set. Here's what changed:

• ReadingLinkBlock type: added newTab?: boolean
• ReadingLink component: passes target="_blank" when newTab is true
• Meeting renderer: passes newTab prop through
• 4 meetings converted to use reading-link blocks with newTab: true for "Before Class" readings:
  • ai-and-work (was inline <a> tags)
  • training-data-and-its-costs (was inline <a> tags)
  • does-ai-understand (was reading-link blocks, added newTab)
  • from-simple-parts (was reading-link blocks, added newTab)
• medium-is-the-message converted from inline markdown to reading-link block
• alphago left as-is (transcript is a reference tool, not a pre-class reading)

The links are rendering inline without line breaks, and hovering shows the current page URL not the reading URL. The ReadingLink component wraps in a <span>, which is inline. These need to be block-level items. Let me check the rendering:

The component renders as a <span> so consecutive reading-links all flow inline. When used as standalone blocks (not inline in prose), they should render as list items. Let me look at how the meeting renderer handles consecutive reading-link blocks — it just renders them one after another with no list wrapper.

The renderer needs to wrap consecutive reading-link blocks in a <ul>:

The ContentBlockList just maps blocks to renderers. I need to group consecutive reading-link blocks into a <ul>. Let me update ContentBlockList:

Need to add bounds checks:

Now consecutive reading-link blocks render as a styled <ul> with the same list styling used elsewhere in meetings. Each reading gets its own line with the › bullet.

No debugging statements. All one logical change.

Committed d22a33c.

Two groups: version bump (26 package.json files) and dependency updates (typescript-eslint 8.57.2 → 8.58.0 in root + config, plus bun.lock).

Two commits:

• 7302dcf — Update typescript-eslint to 8.58.0
• dac98aa — Bump version to 2026.4.7

The preparation-chat block is still there on line 27. It wasn't removed. Can you check what you're seeing? Maybe it's a caching issue in the browser, or the dev server needs a restart to pick up the content change?